In the midst of major turnover from the top down, Pima Community College
is now on probation. The Arizona school
has been notified by its accreditor, the Higher Learning Commission, that it has two years to turn things around or lose its accreditation status
. With an executive team in limbo and reports of poor – and even unethical – management in recent years, it looks like Pima has its work cut out for the next two probationary years.
Problems from the Top Down
Tucson News Now
reports that the problems at Pima that resulted in probation may have initiated from top administration officials. The publication specifically cites allegations of sexual harassment against Ray Flores, the former chancellor of the school, which were left unaddressed by school administrators for a number of years. The commission investigating the school also found a “hostile working environment” was reported by many staff members of the community college.
Other issues reported by the Arizona Daily Star
include corrupt contracting practices. Executives of the school have been accused of approving expensive contracts without going through the appropriate bidding process. Throughout the accusations of mismanagement, there is a common thread of a culture cultivated of “fear and retribution” and an ineffective governing body that failed to address concerns or manage situations that made it challenging to work at the college.
Report Specifics that Led to Probation
Inside Higher Ed
reports that the four-member accreditation team from the Higher Learning Commission found complex issues with the community college that fell into nine major themes. Some of those themes included:
· Alleged absentee governing board
· Environment of fear throughout school staff
· Accusations of sexual harassment against Flores
· Tighter admission standards that excluded some students
· Failure to notify commission on policy changes
· Management mistakes, past and present
The report was written after the accreditation team visited the college in January and interviewed 108 people in regards to the work environment and general operations of the school. Team members found a nearly universal concern for the culture at the school, of which the report stated, “An unhealthy college culture was established through the use of intimidation, fear and an abuse of executive power.”
Sexual Harassment Allegations One Piece of the Puzzle
Many of the concerns seemed to stem from the fact that the accusations of sexual harassment regarding Flores went unheeded by the governing board. Flores took over as chancellor at Pima in 2003. Since that time, eight staff members came forward with allegations of sexual harassment against the chancellor. Several of the women stated that after refusing Flores advances, they were demoted or transferred to different positions at the school.
The first anonymous complaints involving Flores made it to the school’s governing board in 2008. However, board members took no formal action to act on the complaints until 2011. Flores resigned from his position as chancellor last year, two years before his contract was set to expire. He cited health reasons as his reason for leaving.
Other Breaches Cites in Report
Sexual harassment wasn’t the only ethical breach involving Flores and other executives on the Pima staff. The accreditation team also found many at the school described a hostile working environment based on intimidation and fear. The assessment team determined that a “symbiotic” working relationship between Flores and members of the governing board made it difficult, if not impossible, for the board to take necessary action when protocol or ethical standards were clearly breached.
The team also found that Pima had been in the process of pursuing four-year degree offerings, which changed the way the executive team had been conducting operations at the school. Flores determined he only wanted to hire professors with PhDs, and instituted a new admission policy requiring students to achieve a certain score on a standardized examination to be considered for enrollment. The test was the COMPASS, a placement test
This new requirement was in direct conflict with previous enrollment policies at community colleges across the country that required only a high school diploma or GED for admittance. The accreditation team determined that the new requirement debunked the idea of education for the public good, a philosophy most community colleges continue to stand by. Executives for the school rebutted the claim, stating financial restrictions led to the need to focus on students with the greatest odd of college completion.
More Staff Changes on the Way
The Tucson Sentinel
reports that in the midst of the probation ruling, the school is in the process of naming a new chancellor to take over the operations of the troubled school. Four candidates have made the final cut, and each will meet with Pima officials in the coming weeks as the selection process continues. Public interviews with the candidates will also be scheduled in the very near future.
At the same time, many are calling on the members of the governing board to resign their posts as well. However, while current board members have not given official statements on their status with the school, all are giving indications they plan to stay on. However, Faculty Senate President Joe Labuda told the Tucson Sentinel it seems unlikely the school can move forward with the same governing body that is currently on the board. Faculty members have also asked that the search for a new chancellor be halted until a new governing board is named.
As Pima Community College begins its two-year probationary period, many questions remain about the health of the school. As an institution that has been serving the community of Tucson since 1969, it appears there are many stakeholders in the process that are ready and willing to do whatever necessary to ensure Pima remains a vital education source for Arizona residents.